Skip to content

Rocco instead of docco#50

Merged
rstacruz merged 3 commits intorstacruz:masterfrom
f1sherman:rocco-instead-of-docco
Jun 17, 2012
Merged

Rocco instead of docco#50
rstacruz merged 3 commits intorstacruz:masterfrom
f1sherman:rocco-instead-of-docco

Conversation

@f1sherman
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that the instructions to build the site included instructions to install docco with the command 'gem install docco'. This will not work because docco is an npm module. Since it takes a few more steps to install docco, it seemed easier to just use rocco (ruby port of docco), which can be installed with 'gem install rocco'. If you'd still prefer to use docco, I can submit another PR for that.

Also included a couple of very minor tweaks:

  • git ignore .sass-cache files under site/
  • explicitely rescue from "require 'proton'" in Rakefile with a LoadError. Otherwise ruby will exit with a stack trace if proton does not exist.

Thanks for the great library!

@rstacruz
Copy link
Owner

Well, the stack uses Ruby already afterall so I suppose it's fitting. (Never thought anyone else would be touching this part so I didn't bother making it really good, do excuse the mess!)

rstacruz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2012
@rstacruz rstacruz merged commit e0917f9 into rstacruz:master Jun 17, 2012
@rstacruz
Copy link
Owner

Looking back at the comments, I think I confused docco for rocco ("gem install docco" -- obviously wrong, heh). :-)

@rstacruz
Copy link
Owner

Actually Rocco is broken right now: rtomayko/rocco#69 -- there's a drop-in replacement in the name of fl-rocco however. Should work just as fine.

rstacruz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2012
rstacruz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2012
@f1sherman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rstacruz Good call, I did see the error from the issue you referenced but the site appeared to still build properly, though maybe I missed something.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants